July 26, 2006
From HASTRO-L comes news of the live unveiling of the Archimedes Palimpsest at 4pm PST on August 4, which is midnight onwards GMT, or 1am BST. The press-kit states “Join us at the Exploratorium or online as we watch ancient text revealed and read for the first time in a thousand years!“, which makes them much more honest than me. I’d have made sure my panel of experts knew exactly what was going to be revealed so they could coo appreciatively and say something useful to the webcam.
It also adds useful information about what a palimpsest is. “His thoughts were inscribed on goatskin parchment, but the letters and diagrams were scraped off and written over by Greek monks in the Middle Ages.” This sort of thing was usual in the middle-ages, so a lot of ancient texts have been lost. The reason we can read this one is that high-tech imaging equipment is allowing to peek at what was originally on the parchment. Archimedes’ work is the most famous material found, but the book appears to have leaves from other older texts too.
The material found could potentially cast knew light on how the Greeks practiced mathematics and prove a few pet theories completely wrong.
There’s an hour long video on Google with more information.
You can download the video from Google.
technorati tags: archimedes, math, maths, ancient+science
Leave a Comment » |
Maths, Science |
Permalink
Posted by Alun
July 19, 2006
A new edition of the Tangled Bank, looking at what’s happening in science blogging is online at Salto Sobrius. There’s plenty to read from a variety of sciences.
The BBC reports on an apartheid society in early Anglo-Saxon Britain. By combining genetic and archaeological data researchers think they may have more evidence to show that relatively few Saxons came over, but had a large influence on sub-Roman Britain. The original paper is online at the Royal Society, but not publicly accessible. You can buy it for £25. Or not.
Some papers from the Royal Society are available for free download for a while, including Ancient DNA by Eske Willerslev and Alan Cooper if you want to see a preview of what sorts of things might be making the headlines in the next couple of years.
Leave a Comment » |
Archaeology, Biology, Science |
Permalink
Posted by Alun
July 18, 2006
This is a test of YouTube and the movie function on my cheap but usable camera.
It’s a frog and insect arranging to meet for lunch near by my pond. The insect might be hard to spot, so I’ve drawn a diagram. Yes I am that sad.
2 Comments |
Biology, Science |
Permalink
Posted by Alun
July 13, 2006
Inkycircus points to the news that the Western Black Rhino has probably become extinct. We were talking about preservation strategies in what would otherwise have been a management meeting last week. Alan Cann raised the topic about how you would preserve endangered animals when you have few of them. In vivo by cross-breeding them with a similar sub-species or else in vitro by storing their DNA?
We didn’t have a perfect answer. I’m against cross-breeding as a solution. What you would have is a hybrid, so you lose the old species, but it’s not so much that that bothers me. Where would you release the new hybrids to live? The reason the Western Black Rhino has gone extinct is that it lives in a rhino-hostile zone. The new rhinos would run into exactly the same problems unless we could cross-breed them with a kevlar-coated rhino. Otherwise how to you set up and monitor a reserve with sufficient space for rhino to thrive in an affordable way?
That leaves DNA sampling as the solution. That’s not perfect either. There is a common belief that DNA is the instruction book for putting a life-form together. That’s not 100% true. Jack Cohen and Ian Stewart explain it in… umm… What Does a Martian Look Like? (I think). In the case of Human DNA, there’s the material there to build a human, so long as it’s inside a human. The DNA doesn’t contain information like what sort of temperature it should be stored at, or what the uterine surface should be like because it can take those details for granted. Similarly if you have Western Black Rhino DNA in a fertilised egg then do you need to implant it into a Western Black Rhino?
You might get away with a Northern Black Rhino as the mother, but the problem there is that you’re assuming by the time we’re able to release the rhinos again that there’ll be other suitable sub-species that can act as host surviving. It seems more likely to me (the non-biologist) that if you have the DNA, you’ll only have the DNA. It’s a useful record, but it won’t bring the rhino back.
Leave a Comment » |
Biology, Ethics, Geography, Science |
Permalink
Posted by Alun
July 8, 2006
Mixing Memory points to an online toy for creating art in the style of Jackson Pollock.
There’s been a been a lot of ink spilled on what it is that makes Pollock’s work attractive. A paper in physics world, Fractal expressionism by Taylor, Micolich and Jonas says that it could all be about fractals. They also point out a that the idea was recently revived by Mureika, Dyer and Cupchik in Multifractional Structure in Nonrepresentational Art [PDF]. Fractals are frequently found in nature, and the attraction of the painting is that in an abstract way is describes Nature, without distracting the viewer with trees, frogs or anything else specific that might be seen in Nature.
If you prefer the forces of order to chaos then there’s also the Mondrian Generator. It’s hit ‘n’ miss at producing something interesting, but you can decide for yourself whether that suggests that Mondrian knew what made something geometrically attractive, or if he was just lucky.
Leave a Comment » |
Maths, Physics, Science |
Permalink
Posted by Alun